Well said Mike. I encourage all radiology practice to take control of any metrics that the group and the hospital agree to track. I have seen groups lose their hospital agreement because they failed to meet established metrics only to discover that the hospital was not calculating the data correctly.
Metrics I believe should be established and agreed upon jointly between the hospital and the group. Once the metrics and benchmarks are established - the group must take ownership of them and become the entity that reports the results back to the hospital. Not only does this allow the group to ensure that metric are appropriately calculated but it also provides the group with an early warning sign when performance might fail below the establish metric. Reporting to the hospital a dip in performance along with a plan for improvement puts the group in a positive position of power. While reacting to the hospital informing the practice of their failure to meet the metric is not a good place to be.
Some common metrics that I have seen hospitals ask for include:
TAT - all studies
TAT - stat cases
TAT - stroke
TAT - ED
Critical results reporting
Mammo recall rate
Biopsy accuracy
Peer review stats
Consult availability
Patient satisfaction
Referring physician satisfaction
Participation in hospital committees
Radiation safety review and results
Deborah MacFarlane
949.378.8308