Practice Management

 View Only
  • 1.  Billing MRI Bilateral Hips

    Posted 05-04-2018 09:56

    Could really use some help settling a dispute on the appropriate way to bill Bilateral Hip MRI and whether to compensate the radiologist for one or two reads?

     

    Scott A. Pohlkamp
    CEO
    All-American Teleradiology, LLC
    27005 Knickerbocker Rd.
    Bay Village, OH 44140

    (216) 272-9161 cell

    (888) 365-5514 office
    (800) 616-0084 fax

    Serving clients nationwide with sub-specialty teleradiology coverage.

     

    www.allamericanrad.com

     

     

    Notice of Confidentiality

     

    This e mail message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and contains material that is subject to and protected by applicable privacy and security laws, including HIPAA.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are notified that any use, copying or disclosure of this communication is strictly prohibited.  If you receive this communication in error, kindly notify the sender, and then permanently delete it from your system.

     

     

     



  • 2.  RE: Billing MRI Bilateral Hips

    Posted 05-08-2018 07:01
    Scott,

    This is taken from CPT Assistant:

    "June 2006; Volume 16: Issue 6

    Diagnostic Radiology (Diagnostic Imaging) 73721 (Q&A)

    Question

    What is the appropriate code to report for an MRI of the hip? What is the appropriate code to report for a bilateral study?

    AMA Comment

    The appropriate code to report for an MRI of the hip is CPT code 73721, Magnetic resonance (eg, proton) imaging, any joint of lower extremity; without contrast material, or CPT code 73722, Magnetic resonance (eg, proton) imaging, any joint of lower extremity; with contrast material, contingent upon the use of contrast material.

    From a CPT coding perspective, the use of modifier 50, Bilateral procedure, is generally not recommended when bilateral radiology examinations are reported. Rather, the appropriate radiology code is listed twice on the claim form.

    In addition, third-party payer reporting guidelines may differ. For example, the HCPCS Level II modifiers RT and LT may be required, or other specific reporting policies have been established, such as reporting the code as a one-line entry on the claim form with a "2" in the units field. Therefore, it is always important to verify the specific reporting requirements for bilateral radiological examinations with the respective third-party payers."

    I would also verify that both hips are in fact ordered and the radiologist mentions both in his/her findings.



    ------------------------------
    Kristen Sliwinski, CCA, RCC
    RBMA Coding Subcommittee
    StreamlineMD, A PRC Medical Company
    Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44221
    (330) 564-2645
    ------------------------------