Practice Management

 View Only
  • 1.  Medicare Rule for wRVU based contracts

    Posted 04-22-2024 13:32

    We are exploring a new contract where the entity plans to pay per wRVU instead of us billing for professional fees.  Does anyone know that physicians must bill the professional component for Medicare?

    Thank you!



    ------------------------------
    Krissy Luke MHA
    Executive Director
    Radiology Specialists of the Northwest, PC
    Portland OR
    ------------------------------


  • 2.  RE: Medicare Rule for wRVU based contracts

    Posted 04-22-2024 13:56

    Krissy – Yes this is becoming common. I would suggest you base it on Total RVU not just work RVU. Your practice will still have the malpractice and practice expense components to pay which are included in the Total RVU and not the work RVU.

     

    As part of the process the group will sign an assignment of billing rights to the hospital and the hospital will conduct the billing activities. I do recommend that you have a good healthcare attorney review the agreements and not a general corporate attorney to make certain all regulatory issues are addressed appropriately. The radiologists are not required to submit claims to Medicare in this situation.

     

    Hope this helps.

     

    Keith E. Chew, MHA, CMPE, FRBMA

    Principal

    Consulting with Integrity

    217-971-5293

     






  • 3.  RE: Medicare Rule for wRVU based contracts

    Posted 04-23-2024 08:24

    Glad to hear that a facility is exploring paying based on the wRVUs.  Historically, I've seen these arrangements use a percent of global collections.  Not unusual to see the percentage below the actual TC and 26 spilt.  Facility ends up making some money on paying this lower fee.

    Beware of issues being raised if the facility and reading rads are in different states?

    My thoughts......Chris



    ------------------------------
    R. Christopher Sluder CPA
    Administrator
    Rome Radiology Group
    Rome GA
    (770) 324-7464
    ------------------------------



  • 4.  RE: Medicare Rule for wRVU based contracts

    Posted 04-23-2024 09:30
    Hello:

    Alternatively, you could establish a stipend arrangement whereby your group continues to bill the professional component but the facility guarantees a dollar amount per wRVU.  We have worked with several groups that have entered into new facility agreements with this type of arrangement including the West Coast.

    For example, every three months, your group calculates that it has collected $40.00 per wRVU but the facility is guaranteeing say $60.00/wRVU.  You then take the $20.00 difference times the number of wRVUs billed that quarter (or every 6 months) and that's the stipend.

    If you enter into this type of stipend arrangement, you should expect the facility to require a review of your billing and collection performance as well as your payer-contracting performance.

    Best wishes.

    Thanks.
    This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or
    proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity
    to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended
    recipient or intended recipient’s authorized agent, the reader is hereby
    notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is
    prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the
    sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately.





  • 5.  RE: Medicare Rule for wRVU based contracts

    Posted 04-23-2024 10:47

    Krissy,

    We are encountering this as well and here are some things to consider.  The site/hospital could either use its current Tax ID or set up a new Tax ID for the professional fee billing.  The site would bill Medicare Part A for claims processing and, if they set up a new Tax ID, this will require new payer contracts.  The radiologists will need to reassign their benefits in either scenario.

    Or the site/hospital may want to use the group's Tax ID - be careful here because this means the liability will fall to the group, which is a negative since you will likely have little to no control over how the site/hospital performs the billing and accounts receivable management.  A bigger problem with this option, however, is unless all sites/hospitals adopt global billing, it means some of the group's billing might still be done by your biller (billing company or in-house).  While more than one entity can submit a claim to Medicare, a Tax ID can only have one "pay to" address.  And the biller will be billing under your tax ID for the remainder of the professional services that are not paid on a per RVU basis. Payments for both the biller's claims and the site's/hospital's billing will all go to one "pay to" address. This approach is difficult as model and sorting out the payments between the entities is a nightmare.  You will likely also want to reconcile/verify the accuracy of what you are paid by each site/hospital.  With respect to MIPS, the entity billing the claims is the one who is financially impacted by MIPS which would be the sites/hospitals who are billing globally and paying you on a per RVU basis.  Unless there is something in the Professional Services Agreement that speaks to the site/hospital holding the physicians accountable for MIPS, then you are "off the hook."  



    ------------------------------
    Barbara Rubel, MBA, FRBMA
    Senior Vice President, Marketing & Client Services
    MSN Healthcare Solutions
    Past President, FRBMA & GRBMA
    Past President RBMA
    Green Cove Springs FL
    (770) 823-3597 (M)
    ------------------------------