Practice Management

 View Only
Expand all | Collapse all

No Surprises Act

  • 1.  No Surprises Act

    Posted 11-09-2021 15:49

    Here are a couple of questions that have come up in connection with the No Surprises Act, perhaps the wisdom of the forum can assist with answering:

    • Sometimes a claim is submitted to a carrier we believe to be out-of-network but it ends up being processed by a TPA as in-network.  Is there any penalty under the No Surprises Act if we accidentally appeal such a claim without realizing its correctly processed?
    • Will there be a published source for determining the Qualifying Payment Amount?  If so, where and when will it be available?

     

    Thanks!

    John

     

    ---

    John E. Pugh
    Pugh Healthcare Business Advisors
    P: 609.644.4479 F: 609.503.2476

     



  • 2.  RE: No Surprises Act

    Posted 11-09-2021 16:47
    John

    Looking at an EOB, it should be obvious that the payor considers the claim to be subject to the balance billing protections of the No Surprises Act (i.e. emergency service by nonpar provider, service at in network facility by nonpar provider, etc.).  According to the first IFR, payors have to provide the following with their initial payment/denial:

    1. The Qualifying Payment Amount (QPA) for each service
    2. A statement certifying that the QPA applies for purposes of the recognized amount (i.e. the allowed amount used to process the claim).
    3. A statement that if the provider wishes to initiate a 30-day open negotiation period, the provider may contact the payor to do so, and that if the 30 day negotiation period does not result in a determination, the provider may initiate the independent dispute resolution process within 4 days after the end of the 30 day negotiation period
    4. Contact information for the appropriate office to initiate negotiations

    I believe the above might not hold true if the claim is processed in accordance with a state law or All Payor Model Agreement that is more favorable to the patient, but I haven't reviewed the rules with that scenario in mind.

    I don't believe you can appeal to the IDR until you complete the open negotiation, and it has to be done within that 4 business day window after the 30 business day open negotiation period closes.

    I'm sure you will never accidentally appeal to the IDR, and I suspect most radiology groups will very rarely or never appeal to the IDR, since you can only do one CPT code per IDR appeal for a 30 day period per appeal, and the loser pays the IDR fee (likely to be $100's).  I can't see appealing to the IDR unless it's a big payor and a high volume high dollar code where I'm sure I can make a good case for a rate higher than the QPA.  I can really only see it happening in the context of a contentious contract negotiation with a major payor.

    The QPA is defined as (paraphrased), the median contracted rate for the same payor in the same market (i.e. group, individual, etc.) in the same geographic area, as of January 2019, adjusted for inflation based on the CPI-U (last time I checked, that was +9%). 

    As currently laid out in the IFRs, you will have to rely on the EOB from the payor to know the QPA, and there isn't any way to check their calculation.  As of right now, there isn't an avenue for appeal of a QPA calculation, other than perhaps going to court.  One of the things RBMA has asked for in comments is transparency around the calculation, or some kind of audit process.

    ------------------------------
    David Smith FACMPE
    Executive Director
    United Imaging Consultants
    Mission KS
    (785) 393-8387
    ------------------------------



  • 3.  RE: No Surprises Act

    Posted 11-10-2021 10:47

    I have been asked  - Does the surprise act include "free standing facilities" or just hospitals and hospital outpatient services?

     

    Thanks,

     

    Lisa Maples

    Senior Billing Manager

     

    2000 Richard Jones Rd

    Century Plaza, Suite 270

    Nashville, TN  37215

    Ph: 615-577-4057

    Cell: 615-566-8879

    lisa.maples@vumc.org

     

     

     

     

     






  • 4.  RE: No Surprises Act

    Posted 11-10-2021 11:01
    There are two main provisions that have different scopes.

    The requirements to provide written Good Faith Estimates applies to everyone in all settings.

    The limitations on balance billing have a more limited scope with respect to radiology.  They would apply to any patient receiving emergency services (generally following the EMTALA definition) at an out of network facility, and to any patient receiving any service from an out of network provider at an in network facility.  I believe the definition of a facility would include a hospital, as well as a free standing location that bills as a hospital outpatient department or emergency department.  It would NOT include an IDTF or physician office.

    ------------------------------
    David Smith FACMPE
    Executive Director
    United Imaging Consultants
    Mission KS
    (785) 393-8387
    ------------------------------



  • 5.  RE: No Surprises Act

    Posted 01-31-2022 17:21
    Specific to GFE's at Imaging Centers, non IDTF, is it your opinion that IC's like our need to gear up to provide EVERY patient a GFE?   The expense to do so is significant and I'm panicking a bit if we need to do GFE's on all of our patients, including our normal contracted payors.   This will be a significant burden for every free standing imaging center if that's true.

    Apologies if this has been asked before; reading the document alludes to every patient, but certainly there must be some sort of Self Payor or OON caveat that applies.....   

    And, great summary document the RBMA has produced, best I've seen, well done.

    ------------------------------
    Dennis J Chaltraw, CRCE
    Director Revenue Cycle Management
    Oregon Imaging Centers / Radiology Associates
    Eugene OR
    ------------------------------



  • 6.  RE: No Surprises Act

    Posted 01-31-2022 17:48
    Dennis,

    The GFE only applies to uninsured (self pay) patients.

    Sent from my iPhone





  • 7.  RE: No Surprises Act

    Posted 02-01-2022 14:15
    In addition to providing a GFE for uninsured patients, it's also required for insured patients who don't want a claim filed.  You're supposed to ask about this at the time of scheduling.

    In either case, it's not required if the appointment is scheduled less than 3 business days in advance.

    At some time in the future, you will have to send GFE's to insurance companies so that they can issue advanced EOB's to insured patients.  No regulations issued on this yet.

    Dave

    ------------------------------
    David Smith FACMPE
    Executive Director
    United Imaging Consultants
    Mission KS
    (785) 393-8387
    ------------------------------



  • 8.  RE: No Surprises Act

    Posted 02-01-2022 14:18
    p.s.  GFE's also have to be provided on request, even if the patient isn't scheduling.  Any inquiry about cost is supposed to be treated as a request for a GFE.

    Dave

    ------------------------------
    David Smith FACMPE
    Executive Director
    United Imaging Consultants
    Mission KS
    (785) 393-8387
    ------------------------------



  • 9.  RE: No Surprises Act

    Posted 02-04-2022 16:39

    TY

     

    DENNIS WISEMAN

    Chief Executive Officer

    Radiology & Imaging of South Texas

    3226 S. Alameda Street

    Corpus Christi, TX 78404

    (O) 361-888-6684 ext. 2046

    (F) 361-853-4454

    (C) 786-223-2671

     

    logo

     

    "PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL:  This document and the information contained herein are confidential and protected from disclosure pursuant to federal law.  This message is intended only for the use of the Addressee(s) and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED and CONFIDENTIAL. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that the use, dissemination, or copying of this information is strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error, please erase all copies of the message and its attachments and notify the sender immediately."

     






  • 10.  RE: No Surprises Act

    Posted 11-10-2021 14:59

    Lisa,

     

    This is from one of our consultants who has extraordinary knowledge of the law:

     

    The law applies to the following situations. 

     

    1.  Services provided by an out of network provider for Emergency services at an in-network facility.  It doesn't matter what the specialty of the provider is.  An out of network Neurologist who does a stroke consult on a patient in the ER would be under this law.

     

    2.  Non-Emergency services do not apply so long as the patient is notified ahead of time AND can choose an in-network provider.   If you are Inpatient and you need a non-emergency Neurology consult but there is only one neurology group at that hospital so there is no option for the patient to have an in-network provider do the consult and as such no-surprises would apply.

     

    3.  Both non-emergency and emergency services provided by hospital-based providers doctors are not allowed to balance bill even with notice.

     

    This applies to all IP services and OP services at the hospital facility.  It does not apply to free standing centers even if they are owned by the hospital.

     

    Barbara F. Rubel MBA, FRBMA

    Senior VP, Marketing & Client Services

    Immediate Past President, FRBMA

     

    brubel@msnllc.com

    904-657-2038 (Office) | 770-823-3597 (Cell)
    MSNLLC.com

     






  • 11.  RE: No Surprises Act

    Posted 11-11-2021 12:09

    Thank you Barbara.  Our goal is to participate will all payers that our Hospital does.  Lisa

     






  • 12.  RE: No Surprises Act

    Posted 01-28-2022 19:06
    Hello Lisa,
    I've been trying to find this same answer.  As a free standing Private Radiology center, there is no clear definition if this applies to us.  Have you been able to find anything?

    ------------------------------
    Rachel Papka
    CHIO
    Steinberg Diagnostic Medical Imaging
    Las Vegas NV
    (702) 240-1232
    ------------------------------



  • 13.  RE: No Surprises Act

    Posted 01-30-2022 12:02
    The requirement to provide Good Faith Estimates to patients scheduled 3 or more business days in advance who will not be filing an insurance claim applies to any imaging center, physician office, IDTF, hospital outpatient facility, etc.  Eventually this is supposed to extend to providing GFE's to insurance who will then issue advance EOB's to patients.

    The limitations on balance billing for non-emergency services (i.e. all patients get in network benefits based on QPA, providers negotiate out of network rate with insurance or go to IDR) only apply in a facility setting, which includes freestanding hospital outpatient facilities and ASC.  Balance billing limits would not apply in a physician office or IDTF.  Balance billing limits also apply to all emergency services in all settings, generally following the EMTALA definition of an emergency.

    Check out the RBMA Guide to the No Surprises Act for more details.

    ------------------------------
    David Smith FACMPE
    Executive Director
    United Imaging Consultants
    Mission KS
    (785) 393-8387
    ------------------------------



  • 14.  RE: No Surprises Act

    Posted 02-15-2022 16:03
    Thank you everyone for your assistance.  Hope it is going well.

    ------------------------------
    Rachel Papka
    CHIO
    Steinberg Diagnostic Medical Imaging
    Las Vegas NV
    (702) 240-1232
    ------------------------------